Six-ways-to-protect-against-digital-threats
Posted in Digital Threats

Six ways to protect against digital threats

Latest Blogs

Six-ways-to-protect-against-digital-threats

By AMSAT Aug 28,2020

Six ways to protect against digital threats

The fourth industrial revolution is poised to be driven by two major elements: digitization and connectivity. However, manufacturers ought to adopt cybersecurity to ensure physical assets and intellectual property are sufficiently defended against heist and attack. The digitization of manufacturing is driving industrial operators to attain new levels of output, quality, and visibility.

Though these are thrilling times in manufacturing, there is a dark side to the swift progress that’s ongoing. Regrettably, more connections also open the door to new security perils, and preceding generations of manufacturing control systems were not perceived with security or IP connectivity in mind.

 

Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS) conventionally employ proprietary hardware and procedures that are difficult to integrate with network security. Although separated from industrial IP networks, they’re still vulnerable because they’re often set up as simple, open network machine islands, with inadequate or no security. The net result is that digital change is multiplying vulnerabilities at the same time as cyber-attackers are getting more sophisticated.

 

As per recent research by Cisco, if cybersecurity fears delay digital execution, it could take up to five years to catch up with the competition. The industrial sector has some of the least developed security protocols and policies and lowest quality security setup, so there’s a very real risk of being left behind.

Several industrial enterprises don’t have even a simple security policy jotted down. Begin by creating and enforcing a set of written security policies and procedures for your plant that will summarize who should be able to access the network in the first place and how.

It should encompass permanent employees and outworkers, while also spelling out what assets they can evaluate, define acceptable asset use, and define reporting instruments for events. Written policies should also comprise an incident response plan, including any measures to restore critical production systems following a security event.

 

Physical security is key

 

Some of the most severe harm comes from within, when entry is gained from the factory floor. Whether it’s foiling inventory lift, data loss or intellectual property theft, businesses can take advantage of a wide-ranging physical security solution combined with a safe wired and wireless industrial network.

 

Defend assets with physical access limits like locks, key cards, and video surveillance. Where hands-on, you can also add device verification and authorization, plus encryption.

 

Take a rounded approach

 

The chances of a breach increase with a rise in more connections in your manufacturing setting. Your network cannot be secured by any single technology, product, or technique. Defending important manufacturing assets needs a rounded approach that uses numerous layers of protection to address different types of threats.

 

A rudimentary mapping exercise will help you get started, providing a catalogue of all the devices and software on your network. Remember, ‘air gap’ approaches are imperfect – just because a robot or device isn’t linked to the network doesn’t mean it’s totally safe. One corrupt or malicious thumb drive will put a remote machine at risk of unintended downtime or worse, safety events.

 

Isolate your sub-systems

 

To establish zones and design schemas to segment and segregate your sub-systems, it’s important to use industry best practices. On the network boundary, firewalls and intrusion detection will help you foil threats, while within the network, using out-of-band deep packet inspection (DPI) in your routers, switches, and other network devices can help you detect viruses, spam, and other intrusions.

 

Stop attackers in their tracks

 

An important segment of any company’s network architecture spans the internet edge, where the business network meets the public internet. Internet edge is the doorway to cyberspace, and serves numerous roles for the characteristic enterprise network. As network users stretch out to websites and use email for corporate communication, you need to keep your business resources both reachable and protected.

 

Takeaway

 

 

In time, manufacturers who rise to the challenge of digitization by enforcing the next generation of security defenses built for the age of the IIoT will gain competitive edge in the process. By thinking holistically and integrating multiple layers of protection, you can defend intellectual property and physical assets from accidental breaches and cyber theft, while accelerating threat resolution, decreasing downtime, and driving productivity gains across your services.

TAGS

  • Cyber Crime
  • Security Updates
  • Digital Threats

Recent Blogs

Share this article

Ready to Get Started?

Our specialists are ready to tailor our security service solutions to fit the needs of your organization.

    By submitting the form, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

    5-Top-Regulatory-Compliance-Frameworks
    Posted in Cyber Security

    5 Top Regulatory Compliance Frameworks

    Latest Blogs

    5-Top-Regulatory-Compliance-Frameworks

    By AMSAT Aug 28,2020

    Dealing with cyber-threat: a complex challenge

    To keep abreast with industry best practices and to adhere to technical and other requirements, enterprises today often use frameworks to ensure cybersecurity compliance. These frameworks provide best guidelines to help improve security, enhance business processes, meet regulatory requirements, and carry out other tasks essential to attain specific business objectives such as breaking into a particular market niche or selling to government institutions.

    There are a number of such frameworks, and the recommendations set out in them can impose tough and often costly requirements on enterprise resources, not least in circumstances where an enterprise is bound by a host of supervisory compliance regimes

    Cybersecurity Compliance Frameworks

     

    These frameworks typically provide recommendations on executing and managing the several aspects of a security program, such as perimeter defense, access control, authentication, encryption, monitoring, reporting, incident response, and risk management. They may also give guidelines on best practices, and fields that should be encompassed in cybersecurity awareness training.

    These frameworks approach these matters in a particular way, typical of its particular design, and are likely to be influenced by the industry standards or market sector for which they have been designed.

    The following are some of the leading frameworks highly recommended for cybersecurity compliance purposes.

    Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ)

    This specific framework has developed standards for automating the measuring of structural quality and the size of software applications. The standards were drawn up based on exploits and flaws recognized by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP), the SANS Institute, and Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE). The standards of this framework are generally used in handling risks like application security.

    Control Objectives for Information Related Technology (COBIT)

    More than 25 years ago, the Information Security Audit and Control Association (ISACA) introduced the Control Objectives for Information Related Technology (COBIT) framework to highlight the issue of risk reduction in financial institutions. The latest review of COBIT comprises best practices for aligning information technology functions and procedures and connecting these best practices to business plan.

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP)

    This framework provides a standardized way for government agencies to assess the risks of cloud-based software solutions and infrastructure platforms. The framework allows existing security evaluations and packages to be reused across many government organizations and is based on the constant monitoring of cloud products and services for real-time cybersecurity.

    National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    This is a division of the US Chamber of Commerce, which deals with cybersecurity issues impacting the operators and managers of serious infrastructure. NIST’s recommendations for manufacturing, quality control, security, and other matters are grounded on the outcomes of consultations with security industry specialists, government agencies, and researchers. The framework offers a set of controls and balances to help infrastructure operators to manage their cybersecurity risks.

    Privacy Shield

    The Privacy Shield Framework was recognized to substitute the US-EU Safe Harbor rules which were issued to ensure that US companies complied with European Union (EU) data protection standards when shifting EU data across borders. The framework was intended to minimize and alleviate the risk of meddling when data is transferred between the EU and the USA.

     

    TAGS

    • Regulatory Compliance Frameworks
    • Security Updates
    • FedRAMP

    Recent Blogs

    Share this article

    Ready to Get Started?

    Our specialists are ready to tailor our security service solutions to fit the needs of your organization.

      By submitting the form, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

      Key Features of a File Integrity Monitoring Software
      Posted in Integrity Monitoring

      7 Key Features of a File Integrity Monitoring Software

      Latest Blogs

      Key Features of a File Integrity Monitoring Software

      By AMSAT Dec 31,2020

      7 Key Features of a File Integrity Monitoring Software

      The growing occurrence of data breaches over the last few years has led to the creation of a number of regulatory standards such as the PCI-DSS. These standards get companies to embrace security best practices, including the need to supervise all types of changes made to server configurations. Although some of these configuration changes have no considerable effect on systems, a few unforeseen changes could put companies at risk, which may also lead to non-compliance.

       

      The File Integrity Monitoring Solution

       

      To help secure your critical data and maintain compliance, you need to spot changes down to the smallest detail in real time. This is achieved by creating a baseline state and supervising for file changes relative to the baseline. 

       

      The problem is that it’s unrealistic to oversee every application or device in your network all the time. Moreover, today’s networks are far too multifaceted to be checked physically, and this reality holds true even in small to mid-sized organizations. Therefore, you need a solution that helps you take over all these changes without the risks of manual editing. And this results in the need for File Integrity Monitoring (FIM).

       

      Here are the features you should be looking for when assessing any file integrity monitoring solution.

      1. Multiple Platform Support

       

      A typical organization today commonly runs on Windows, Linux, Solaris, AIX or even HP-UX. So, it’s important to try to find an effective solution than can supervise numerous platforms without incompatibility issues.

       

      2. Easy Integration

      The FIM of your choice should be able to impeccably work with other data security solutions such as associating change data with event and log data. This lets your team swiftly recognize, trace, and relate problem-creating changes with each other.

       

      3. Prolonged Perimeter Protection

       

      You should opt for an FIM solution that goes beyond change discovery in files and its characteristics. Network devices such as firewalls, routers, switches, and VPN concentrators should also be taken into account by your solution.

       

      4. Smarter Change Detection

       

      Spotting a change at a minimum means recognizing if a hash of the file has altered. A sturdier FIM solution can look at numerous traits pertaining to a file besides the hash. All of this supplementary metadata offers superior insight of the true nature of the change. For instance, changing the owner of a file does not change its contents, which implies that the hash would remain the same. Nevertheless, a more sophisticated FIM lets you comprehend if the file’s owner has been changed.

       

      5. Multi-Level Logging and Simplified Reporting

       

      Conventional file integrity monitoring solutions generally operate on each individual machine, with contemporary tools providing a cohesive view of all changes across the network. This lets you manage all of the servers in a single view. Another aspect to look for in an FIM solution is advanced reporting of rollup information. Preferably, your FIM tool should have a sophisticated dashboard that lets you assess the state of your infrastructure at an unconventional level and subsequently drill down volumes of change data into actionable information.

       

      6. Simplified Rule Configuration

       

      Your file integrity monitoring solution ought to have a system to easily define monitoring guidelines for a server or device. It should also have a mechanism to duplicate those rules to many devices across your infrastructure.

       

      7. Real-Time Monitoring

       

      This feature protects the integrity of your IT infrastructure by comparing misconfigurations in real time against your internal standards or outside policies for compliance and security best practices.

      TAGS

      • File Integrity Monitoring
      • FIM
      • FIM Solution
      • Prolonged Perimeter Protection
      • Smarter Change Detection

      Recent Blogs

      Share this article

      Ready to Get Started?

      Our specialists are ready to tailor our security service solutions to fit the needs of your organization.

        By submitting the form, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

        Cybersecurity-Weekly-News-Roundup
        Posted in Cyber Security

        Dealing with cyber-threat: a complex challenge

        Latest Blogs

        Cybersecurity Weekly News Roundup for First Week of Jan 2021

        By AMSAT Jan 01,2021

        Dealing with cyber-threat: a complex challenge

        The outgoing week saw a handful of incidents with far-reaching effects on the
        cybersecurity landscape. From the Russian attackers compromising Microsoft
        cloud customers to Vietnam being targeted in a supply chain attack to Wasabi
        cloud storage service knocked offline for hosting, the world of cybersecurity was
        rocked by multiple events perpetrated by malicious threat actors.

        Here is the review of the stories that made headlines in the outgoing week.  

         

        SolarWinds hackers accessed Microsoft source code

        On Thursday, Microsoft recognized that hackers who organized a huge hack of government and private computer networks gained access to its internal “source code,” a vital element for its software. The tech giant attributed the attack to Russian-led hackers.

         

        Russian hackers compromised Microsoft cloud customers through third party

         

        Russian government hackers compromised Microsoft cloud customers and stole emails from at least one private-sector company. People familiar with the matter said that it was a disturbing development in Moscow’s continuing cyberespionage campaign targeting several U.S. agencies and corporate computer networks.

         

        Vietnam targeted in complex supply chain attack

        A group of cagy hackers perpetrated an ingenious supply chain attack against Vietnamese private companies and government agencies by inserting malware inside an official government software toolkit.

        Wasabi cloud storage service knocked offline for hosting malware

        Cloud storage provider Wasabi suffered an outage after a domain used for storage endpoints was suspended for hosting malware.

        TAGS

        • Cybersecurity News Roundup

        • Security Updates
        • SolarWinds
        • Russian hackers

        Recent Blogs

        Share this article

        Ready to Get Started?

        Our specialists are ready to tailor our security service solutions to fit the needs of your organization.

          By submitting the form, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy